One of the things that I have learned in the course of my studies is that there are things which are true, but for which only a weak argument may be given. Conversely when considering these things the arguments against them are very strong. An example might clarify what I am trying to say.
My full name is "Robert Eugene Canup II". However, if I try to issue a formal logical proof of that fact I am unable to do so. The best that I can do is "Well, that's just my name". This is a very weak argument in favor of the proposition - it would get you laughed out of any class in formal logic were you to attemp to use it as a defense of just about any other proposition.
On the other hand, it is possible to mount a very strong and persuasive argument against the proposition: "There are less than 5 people on the entire planet Earth named 'Robert Eugene Canup II', therefore the odds of any random person having that name are at least one billion to one against it. Statistically the chance of the proposition being true is very very small. It is therefore highly likely - to the point of ridiculous certainty - that the proposition is false."
When applied to you, or almost anyone else on the planet the counter proposition: "That your name is NOT Robert Eugene Canup II" is far more likely to be true than false.
From Yin and Yang this is not too surprising: most strong arguments are on the side of truth, and most weak arguments are on the side of falsehood. However, sometimes the truth has only weak arguments in its favor, and falsehood has very strong arguments in opposition to the truth.
In fact this phenomonon of weak truth and strong falsehood follows as an unexpected corrolary to the Goedel undecideability thereom. Goedel demonstrated that in any system of logic there are propositions which are true, but which cannont be proven to be true from inside the system. It is not surprising that some of these unprovably true propositions would have strong arguments against them. If there were NO argument against them they could be shown to be true by a weak argument in their favor. Most people would simply not expect to encounter examples of a Goedel undecidable truth in every day life, but they do happen.
In the next section of these pages I discuss the greatest problem facing mankind. I am only able to advance weak arguments as to the existence of the core truth that I point out there: while I can give very strong arguments against what I have to say in that section. Nevertheless, I am convinced - for reasons which would require far more bandwidth to explain than I have available - of the truth of what I have to say in that section. Please read that section with a more open mind than you would normally give to an unconventional viewpoint: the core problem I discuss there was intentionally crafted over many years to take advantage of the way that intelligent people view the world.